History of Russia (Tatishchev). The history of Russia from the found hours by unabashed little time through thirty years of the name is described by the deceased and the governor of Astrakhan, Vasil Mikitovich Tatishchev

V.N. Tatishchev. History of Russia.

Adaptation from Late Slavic - O. Kolesnikov (2000-2002)

CHASTINA PERSHA

For the foregoing information about the history of the foreign and Russian

I. It's also history.Іstorіya is a walnut word, which means the same as we have podії abo diannya; If you want to look at things, you should look at some of the good things, for the work you need to know, done by people, it means that you should be able to look at nature, or you shouldn't be guilty of looking at something above nature, but, respectfully, you could not be able to see One cannot eat without a reason for the outcry. Cause good for everyone, as from God, so from people, but about the whole year, I will not be more distracted. To whom does the tsikavo explanation of the tsiy, the Rajah become familiar with "Physics" and "Moral" of Pan Wolf1.

Divine. Church. Gromadyanska. natural... Well, the history is in its own way, it’s not a shame to say it briefly, but it’s about furnishing and writing about writing in a whole new development. So, buvaє according to the circumstances: 1) the history is sacred or holy, or more beautifully divine; 2) Ecclesiastes, or ecclesiastical; 3) Politics abo huge, but we have more zvikli nazivati svitska; 4) Sciences and scholars. The first thing is, it’s not like that. From the tsikh of the Persha, please, God, how Moses and іnshі prophets and apostles described. Before it, the history is natural or natural, about the children, which vibrate by the forces that are invested in the opening of the sight of God. It is natural to describe everything that is seen in the elements, that is, in the fires, in the waters and in the earth, as well as on the earth - in the creatures, the dews and the earth. In the church - about the dogmas, statutes, orders, stasis of any kind of furnishings in the church, as well as about the rites, debates, and the firm right of right in the first place and the dissemination of the wrong, repetitive, or schoolchildren's thoughts and arguments in the church, and before that, the rituals of the church. In the svitsku velmi richly included, Ale, the head rank, all the people, good and praiseworthy or vicious and evil. The fourth about the ear and the walk of the children scientific names, Science and other people, as well as the books they have seen, and such, for which reprobate is out of the question.

II. cinnamon іstorії... There is not a lot of mirkuvati about the corny of history, which can be leathery and seeming. However, oskilki deyaki may call you about speeches in different ways and reports of misunderstandings and reports of mischief, bagatorazovo, because of a mischievous wickedness, who are rather awkward, but those who are too short about the right to deliver, and so on the right I spent a lot of time, and after I judged them, explain briefly about those.

Someone has been examined, but history is not very good, because the memory of coli-nih events is suitable, good and evil, so all those who have been before a long time or recently through hearing, reference history, Yaka, either from our own powerful people, or from those people, ask us to report good things, but beware of evil. For example, if I’m guessing if I’m bothering ribalki, catching riba and chimala, we’re creepy, then I, wickedly, ask the Duma deyaky podushuvannya in the same way about the same kind of trick to report zusil; For as I am bachelor of the villainy, for the іnshiy recklessness, condemned on a grave punishment for death, then, horribly, the fear of such a righteousness, for death, suppress it. In the same rank, everything is read by us, the history and the story of the old days, because we are so sensitive to us, as if we would have bached and seen.

It is possible to briefly say that there is no ludin, no settlement, no promises, science, no uryad, and more than one ludin himself, without knowing this thoroughness, wisdom and brown can not be. For example, taking about science.

Theologian history is needed... First and foremost є theologian, that is, the knowledge about God, his wisdom, omnipotence, we know and know how to bliss. But we can’t say that some theologian is wise, because we don’t know the ancient righteousness of God, denuded to us in the writings of the saint, and also if, for example, in the dogmas, for example, it is For the orders of stasis, introduced and new introduced. Slidcho, їm history is divine and churchly, and before that і huge people are simply necessary, about Guetsіy2, glorious French theologian, to finish showing.

The lawyer is confessing to the history... Another science of jurisprudence, like to instill goodness and the binding of the skin before God, in front of oneself and those who, consequently, add peace of mind and soul. But we can’t be a lawyer, we’re thinking about the names of the buti, because we don’t know the many tones and the super-talk about the laws of nature and the big ones. And how can you judge the right to judge, how old and new laws and the reasons for the stagnation do not know? For that, you need the history of the laws of the nobility.

The third is medicine, or medicine, because there’s a field in that ’, people’s health must be taken care of, and if you turn the wrong way, don’t allow the development of a disease. It’s a science that’s a whole lot to lay down from history, more and more from the ancient knowledge of people, what kind of a person is sick to eat, such as faces and how to play, like the power and the movement of the power, who are in power and watch over the ailments of the robiti є such is not safe, who can destroy his soul and soul, he wants to go to the negligence not so easily. I don’t guess about some of the parts of philosophy, but I can tell you briefly, that all philosophy in history is based and supported by it, for everything that we have from the ancients, the right to misbehavior and vicious knowledge, we know, the essence to the point of our history.

Political part. Janus... The policy of the three business parts is stored: internal management, also economy, peace of mind and development. All three are not less than history, and without it, you can’t be thorough, so in economic management It is necessary for the nobility, as from whom we have gone to the trap, in some way I will return to change, such as cories and through the use of money and care, for those about the weather and may be wisely peaceful. Through the wisdom of the ancient Latin, the King Janus was portrayed with two persons, so he knew about the past reports and about the maybut and from the butt wisely.

Until the head of his life, Tatishchev came to visit a whole series of surroundings. We can understand the skoda from the instability of soil geography of Russia and the links of geography from history, if you know the necessary information and take a look at all the historical views about Russia. So, as the earthly capital came to pass the mercy, Tatishchev turned up to the first time, becoming the vivchati of the literature and the material. A list of win mav on uvazi date historical tvir ("historical order" - that is the author's analogical tvir in the style of the New hour) Clearly the literature: the chronicles of the dates of the past, the sound between the names is implicit).

Yak Tatischev writes, having taken a thousand books from his library, but with a large part he has not been quicker, more than Volodya will be deprived of his useful and Polish movs. With the help of the Academy of Sciences for the help of the Academy of Sciences, the vicorist of the ancient authors, the viconany Kondratovich.

Vityagi from the "History" of Herodotus (Ch. 12).
Vityagi s book. VII "Geography" of Strabo (Ch. 13).
Z Plinia the Elder (Ch. 14).
Claudia Ptolemy (ch. 15).
Z Kostyantin Porphyrogenitus (Ch. 16).
Three books of personal writers, pratsya Bayura (ch. 17).

A special place in the ethnogeographic statements of Tatishchev loan is Sarmatian theory. The etymological "method" of Tatishchev іlustru mіrkuvannya z Ch. 28: history stands for Venelain, Fini - Sumaline, German - Saxoline, Swedes - Roxoline, zagalny element"Alain", tobto the people. The same zagalnye element vіn vіdіlya in the vіdomichs behind the ancient dzherels the names of the tribes: Alani, Roksalani, Rakalani, Alanorsi, and to rob visnovok - Mova Fіnіv Near Movi Sarmativ. The announcement about the dispute of the Finno-Ugric peoples was already reflected in Tatishchev's hours.

The Іnsha group of etymology is tied with the sound of the Slovenian tribes in the ancient Dzherels. Zokrema, only Ptolemy, behind Tatishchev's stewed (Ch. 20) name words: Agoriti and pagoriti - from gir; bisi, tobto bosi; come in - come in; Zenchen, tobto grooms; Hemp - hemp; tolistobogi, tobto tovstobokih; tolistosagi, tobto is ogryadna; mothers, to be informed; Pleso, tobto plishivi; sabosi, or dogs; drop, tobto harrow; sapotreni - obachny; Sward, tobto weld (welding) etc.

tatishchevsky vidomosty

Especially for those who know the problem of becoming so-called "Tatishchevski vidomosty", as revenge on information, which is not possible in the literature we see. Tse texts of a ripe obsyagu, from one or two words to the great general announcements, which include the great promises of the princes and boyars. Inodi Tatischev comments on the sounds in the primitives, refer to the literature, not modern science for it is necessary not to identify ("Rostovska", "Golitsinskaya", "Rozkolnitsky", "Litopis of Simon Bishop"). Tatishchev does not appear in a large variety of original sounds.

A special place in the array of "Tatishchevsky vidomosty" loan short break special literature, which informs about found period History of Rus (IX-X centuries). The author of the Joachim's literature was Tatishchev, having entrusted the first Novgorod bishop, Ioakim Korsunian, who was a confederate of Khreshchennya Rusi.

In the history of the establishment, the head of Tatishchev's news was announced. The histories of the other half of the 18th century (Shcherbatov, Boltin) revised their views without revision according to the literature. Skeptically, the position before them is tied to the names of Schletzer and especially Karamzin. Tsey stayed in respect of Joachim's writings with Tatishchev's “zhartom” (to be a non-grabbing mistification), and rozkolnitsky's writings are more boldly voiced. At the presentation of a critical analysis, Karamzin introduced a number of specific tatish through a special zbіga obstavin).

Tsikavo, many skeptics (Peshtych, Lur'є, Tolochko) do not call Tatishchev in the scientific inconsistency and unaware that Tatishchev didn’t bully in an hour happy to understand about the science of ethics and the strict rules of formalizing the historical record. "Tatishchevski vidomosty", as bi before them are not put, є it’s not just a misconception of the reader, but sooner I’m imagining self-actualized preliminaries, as well as not simple “fiction”. Additional views are, as a rule, visible in the dzherels of logical Lanka, reconstructed by the author, and illustrated by political and educational concepts. Discussion about "Tatishchevski vidomosty" is trivial.

The problem of "minus-text" tatishchevsky pratsi

The statement of the problem, like the term itself, is due to A. V. Goovenko. Tsei prelіdnik called "minus-text" sounds, like Tatishchev’s on the day, I want є in the Ipatievsky and Khlabnikovsky literatures (in the whole terminology of the supplementary text, which are also “present” The main array of tatishchevskoy text mіzh 1113 і one thousand one hundred and ninety vіsіm pp. go down to the list of the same type, which is good for us in the name of the Іpatіїvskiy and Khlebnikovskiy. Yaksho dzherelo Tatishcheva buv short quality, Nіzh two went to us the literature of the same type, why should the Tatischevskiy text take revenge not only on additional updates, ale and great lacunas, but also majestic is the number of defective readings, including a number of complete comic books? Viewed on the side of food from the side of the clerk in the reliability of tatischevsky views of the city.

Dzherela other-fourth parts of the "History"

Dzherel Tatishchev's literature is characterized by himself in Ch. 7 parts of the first "History".

Preserved also the first edition of the given text, which has a number of caveats, as well as the characteristics of the dzherel, was saved in the Nimetsky translation.

cabinet manuscript

In the first edition of the list of dzherel not guessed zvsim. According to Tatishchev's description, he repudiated it in 1720 from the library of Peter I and becoming a part of all the collection, the whole list of "people", brought to 1239 fate, but the end was consumed. Briefly a viklad podії to Yuriy Dolgoruky, then reports.

On Tikhomirov's dummy, the whole literature has been ruined. For Peshtych and V.A. It was also said that I’m about the same illustrated copy of the Radziwill’s literature (div. Nizche).

Tolochko shilny zasumnivatsya in yo iznuvanny or let it go, but the phrase "with persons" does not mean the creation of the star, but the manifestation in the new description of the name of the characters, included by Tatishchev in the "History".

rozkolnitskikh litopis

For Tatischeva, I was taken to Siberia from a rozkolnik in 1721, the whole copy of an old manuscript on parchment, ended in 1197 with the fate of Nestor's name in the title. With regard to modern terminology, in 1721 Tatishchev was not in power in Siberia, but in the Urals. The manuscript, if it was lost, was ruined.

It is well known to the optimists that the editorial office of the Kiev Litopis is not aware of it. Zokrema, B. A. Ribakov saw the soundless unique sounds of the entire list (186 sounds for the XII century) and the sounds in the main one up to the "Literary of Peter Borislavich".

On the thought of A.P. Tolochko, the proportion of the debate in the supplementary Tatischev's views and the text of the Patriarch's list is very natural and it is quite natural to explain the particularity of Tatishchev's creative manners:

Tolochko stverdzhu, but a number of reading "History of Russia" for the XII century can not go down to the Ermolaevsky list, but render the list of the Ipatievsky literature, close to Khlebnikovsky. There is a whole hypothetical list of Tolochko and the deluded Rozkolnitskiy litiswriters, who are responsible for all Tatishchev's views, which will be referred to the old manuscript, є mistified. On the thought of Tolochko, a friend of the Khlabnikov's type of literature, really Vikoristan Tatishchev and seeing for the "rozkolnitsky", for the right, she was in the library of Prince D.M. in the title of Nestor as a writer. However, all without a blame for the textual criticism of Tolochko, as they inflicted nothing on the victorian Tatischevim "another script of the Khdebnik type,"

Kenigsberg manuscript

For Peter I, the copy of the Kenygsberzkiy literature was destroyed, at the same time as the name of Radzivilovskiy. A copy of the copy is kept in the Library of the Academy of Sciences (31.7.22).

Triva until 1206 fate, ale the end of the world. Tse a complete description of the original.

Zgіdno A.P. Tolochko, go in quietly in the fall, if Tatishchev tries to clearly identify the literature (for example, Radziwilovskaya), he admits the obvious pardons.

Golitsinskiy manuscript

It is familiar to the textual analysis of S.L. For the іnshaya dumkoyu (M.N. Tikhomirov, B.A.

An important argument for the toughness of Tatishchev's insanity is the fact that all of the manuscripts of the Ipatyivskiy Litopis are revenge on Kyiv, as well as the Galicia-Volinskiy Litopis. However, as meaning N.M. Karamzin, Tatischeva was in the house of only Kyivska, but not Galitsko-Volynskyi litopis.

Tatischev means that the Golitsinsky manuscript was completed in 1198 rots, and after 19 years it was introduced without order of addition. In the first saved version of the description of Tatischev's writings, as well as in the whole manuscript bulo from Striykovsky. In the residual version, the phrase is tidied up.

per happy news, Razriv between the ends of Kiev and the ear of the Galicia-Volinsky list of schools 5-6 rocks. However, on the margins of the Ermolaevsky list, there is a refusal of 19 rockets, and a view to the similarity with the text of Striykovsky.

Zgіdno Tolochko, Tatischev, having accepted the text of the Galicia-Volynskiy list in the Ermolaevskiy list for Tvіr, has fallen from the Polish historian Striykovskiy (more offending the texts took the praise of Roman Mstislavich), I do not know about them because of the children There was no more opportunity to turn up to the library of D.M. Golitsin.

Cyril manuscript

Razpochato by the shift of the Chronograph from the beginning of the svitu, promotions to Ivan the Terrible.

For Tikhomirov, the book of Statechna, for the thought of Peshtich, taken by Tolochko - a friend of a part of the Lviv literature.

Novgorod manuscript

For Tatishchev, the names of the Vremennik, including the Law of Yaroslavl and Maє, was written about the folding in 1444; Recognition of a historian from a rozkolnik in the list and publications in the Library of the Academy of Sciences. Infected vidomy yak Academic list of the Novgorod first literature of the young divorce, which is efficient to avenge the truth on Rus. Zgidno B.M. Kloss, Tolstoy list of these writings by the clerk in the library of D.M. Golitsin in the end of the 1720s.

Pskov manuscript

The whole manuscript of the text of the Novgorod P'yatoi (with additional figures) and the Pskov first literatures and was preserved in the Library of the Academy of Sciences 31.4.22 with the signs of Tatishchev, the text of the Pskov period will end 1547. ... For Tatischeva, it will end with 1468 rock. Pskov zvistki Tatishchev did not boom vicoristano.

Krekshinsky manuscript

According to Tatishchev's description, wines of promotions for 1525 rik, including the childbirth, are seen from Novgorodskoy behind the warehouse of sounds and according to dates.

On the thought of Peshtych, the whole list of the "Russian Vedomosti" and "Voskresenskoy Litopisu". On the thought of Ya. S. Lur'є, the Novgorod editorial office of the Statistical Book. Zgіdno Tolochko, the list of Krivoborsky, the Chortkiv list of Volodymyr's writers, published in volume XXX PSRL.

Nikon's manuscript

For Tatishchev, the "Litographer of the Resurrection Monastery", signed by the hand of Patriarch Nikon and continued until 1630. The ear of yogo is similar to the rozkolnitsky and Kenigsbergska, and until 1180 the rock is close to the Golitsinsky.

Seemingly, the basis of the texts of parts 3 and 4 of the "History" of the boule was deposited with the Academic XV list of Nikon's list of literature (above to the Library of the Academy of Sciences from the collection of Theophan Prokopovich in 1741), a copy of the documentary written by the author 39 Bula was divided into two volumes, in niy є Tatishchev's marks.

Nizhny Novgorod manuscript

Behind Tatishchev's wislovoy, it will end in 1347 rock, and not less than 300 rock. About yogo sorcerer Tatishchev povidomlyaє in sheets from 12 spring 1741 rock.

Zgidno M.N. Tikhomirov, tse Alatirsky list of the Resurrection literature, which is innocentїї text. For the occasional tribute, the manuscript dates back to the third quarter of the 16th century and was brought to 1347.

Yaroslavl manuscript

Purchases from a retailer on the square, gifts to the English Royal suspension. Mа bezlich additional from the death of Dmitry Donskoy. For Tolochko, the same Rostov, which is supposed to be hidden in primitka.

Manuscripts of Volinsky, Khrushchev and Eropkin

For the assessment of A.P. Tolochko, he saved a number of manuscripts from the Volinsky library, including a number of copies of the 17th-18th centuries, and there are no shukany texts there. The texts of the Eropkіnskіy lіtopіkі are close to "Told about the ear of Moscow". Khrushchev's manuscript is a tse Khrushchev's list of the Statistical book with a number of additional 17th century.

History of the 17th century

At "Proceedings" to the first part of Tatishchev, a number of dzherels are hidden, History XVII the capital, a large part of those who have been saved and identified. However, among them it is said:

seeing

The first two parts of the 1st volume of the "History" will be seen for the first time in - pp. in Moscow by G. F. Miller (I volume I part, facsimile in pdf and I volume II part, facsimile in pdf). Volume II was seen in volume II (Volume II, facsimile in pdf), Volume III - in 1774 Rіk m (Volume III, facsimile in pdf) (Volume II-III includes another part of "History"), Volume IV (third section " History ") - in 1784 rotsi (IV volume, facsimile in pdf), and the manuscript of the fourth part of the" History "was known by M.P. іst. that in. grew up. in 1848 rotsi (V volume, facsimile in pdf).

With the whole deprivation of persh and other parts of the boule, in the main it was finished by the author. The third and fourth parts have gone through the first-time reprobation and the basis for everything on the Nikonivskoy Litopis with additional supplements.

Even before the establishment of Tatishchev’s pratsyu there will be a number of contemporary histories. A part of Tatishchev's preparatory work for his death was stored in Miller's briefcases. In addition, a number of materials from Tatishchev were published by the viewers of the Radziwill literature in 1767 to supplement the text.

Outside the academic vision of Tatishchev's "History" (including the never seen before the first edition) came in 1962-1968 rock and revisited in 1994. At the end of the 1st volume, including the first part, II-III volumes - another published edition of another part, IV volume - the first edition of another part, V volume - the third part, VI volume - the fourth part, VII volume - the actions of the preparatory materials. Volumes revenge readings, comments, as well as an archeographic survey of Tatishchev's manuscripts, prepared by S.N.Valk.

Published in 2003 by the AST version and available on-line (Volume 1 Volume 2 Volume 3 The third volume “History” was prepared in spelling, close to the current one. ".

Tatishchev V.N. Zbirka creation. U 8 t. M.-L., Science. 1962-1979. (Revision: M., Ladomir. 1994)
- Vol. 1. Part 1. 1962.500 pages ; S. N. Valka "About the manuscripts of a part of the first" History of Russia "V. N. Tatishchev, pp. 54-75)
- T.2. Part 2. Ch. 1-18. 1963.352 pp.
- T.3. Part 2. Chapter 19-37. 1964.340 pp.
- T.4. First edition of Part 2 of "History of Russia". 1964.556 pp.
- T.5. Part 3. Chapter 38-56. 1965.344 pp.
- T.6. Part 4. 1966.438 pp.
- T.7. 1968.484 pp.
- T.8. Little do it. One thousand nine hundred seventy-nine.
Tatishchev V.N. Notes. Leaves. (Series "Naukova Spadschina". T.14). M., Science. 1990.440 pp. ( including leafing, tied with a robot over the "History")

Notes

Gorovenko A.V. Sword of Roman Galitsky. Prince Roman Mstislavich in history, epics and legends. - SPb.: "Dmitro Bulanin", 2011. "S. 294-303.
Ya. S. Lur'є. History of Russia in the literature and springs of the New Hour
Tolochko A. “The History of Russia” by Vasil Tatishchev: Dzherela and Evidence. - Moscow: New Literary Review; Kiev: Criticism, 2005.544 p. Series: Historia Rossica. ISBN 5-86793-346-6, ISBN 966-7679-62-4. Book discussion: http://magazines.russ.ru/km/2005/1/gri37.html Magazine Hall | Critical Masa, 2005 N1 | Faina Grimbergen - Oleksiy Tolochko. "History of Russia" by Vasil Tatishchev
Gorovenko A.V. Sword of Roman Galitsky. Prince Roman Mstislavich in history, epics and legends. - SPb.: "Dmytro Bulanin", 2011. "Tatishchevski vidomosty" of assignments to the chapters of another part: p. 261-332.
Gorovenko A.V. Sword of Roman Galitsky. Prince Roman Mstislavich in history, epics and legends. - SPb.: "Dmitro Bulanin", 2011. S. 421-426 (Dodatok 6. Chi mav Tatishchev "another list" of the Ipatyivskiy Litopis? Similarity of Articles 6652 and 6654 pp. Tatishchevskiy Litopisnogo Zvodu). Pp. 426-434 (Dodatok 7. Farewell to the Rozkolnitsky literature. About the textual proofs of the other Khlabnikovsky type of literature by Tatishchev, presented by A. P. Tolochko).
A. V. Zhuravel. "Brekhun, base and regotun"
Div., For example: S. L. Peshtich. Russian history of the XVIII century. L., 1965. Part 1.P. 261.
Gorovenko A.V. Sword of Roman Galitsky. Prince Roman Mstislavich in history, epics and legends. - SPb.: "Dmitro Bulanin", 2011. S. 313-320
Tolochko 2005, p. 53; Tatishchev V.N. Op. Vol. 1. M.-L., 1962.S. 47, 446
Gorovenko A.V. Sword of Roman Galitsky. Prince Roman Mstislavich in history, epics and legends. - SPb.: "Dmitro Bulanin", 2011. - p. 307.
Tolochko 2005, p. 285-286
Tolochko 2005, pp. 166-169
Tolochko 2005, p. 153
Tolochko 2005, p.103, 142-143, 159-166
however, A.P. Tolochko has revealed the Polish translation of the Ipatyivskyi literature ("Annales S. Nestoris"), the chipping of the 18th century by Metropolitan Lev Kishkoy, for the first time Galitsko-Volinskyi literature (Tolochko 2005), p.116-134
Tatishchev V.N. Op. T.7. M., 1968.S. 58
PSRL, vol. II. M., 1998. Readings from the Ermolaevsky list, str. 83 okremoї pagіnatsіyu
Tolochko 2005, p. 108, 115
Tatishchev V.N. Op. Vol. 1. M., 1962.S. 47
Tolochko 2005, p. 58
Tolochko 2005, p. 60; for a description of the manuscript, see Pskov Litopis. PSRL. T. V. Vip. 1.M., 2003.S. XX, L-LI
Tatishchev V.N. Op. U 8 vol. T. 3. M., 1964.p.309
Tolochko 2005, pp.65-68
Tatishchev V.N. Notes. Leaves. M., 1990.S. 281
Tolochko 2005, p. 170-177
Tolochko 2005, p.180-182
Tolochko 2005, p.185-190

plan
Entry
1 Robot over "History"
2 Plan
Entry
3 Dzherela of the first part of the "History"
4 Tatischevski views
5 The problem of "minus-text" tatishchevsky pratsi
6 Dzherela other-fourth parts of the "History"
6.1 Cabinet manuscript
6.2 rozkolnitskikh litopis
6.3 Kenigsberg manuscript
6.4 The Golitsinsky manuscript
6.5 Cyril manuscript
6.6 Novgorod manuscript
6.7 Pskov manuscript
6.8 Krekshinsky manuscript
6.9 Nikon's manuscript
6.10 Nizhny Novgorod manuscript
6.11 Yaroslavl manuscript
6.12 Rostov manuscript
6.13 Manuscripts of Volinsky, Khrushchev and Eropkin
6.14 Orenburg manuscript

7 History of the 17th century
8 Vidannya
9 Doslidzhennya

Entry

History of Russia (the name of the first appearance is again: “History of Russia from the found hours, unceasingly through thirty years of choice and described by the deceased tamnim radnik and the Astrakhan Governor Vasil Mikitovich Tatishchev ") - the great historical era of the Russian historical historian Vasil Tatishchev, one of the most important creators of the Russian history of the other fourteenth century of the 18th century, the significant transition

1. Robot over "History"

In 1739, Tatishchev was brought to St. Petersburg pratsyu, over yakim vin pratsyuvav, for yogo words, 15-20 years (tying the ear of robots with the so-called office manuscripts and specialties of Peter I and Ya.V. Bruce), pratsyuvati over it and zgladom, "zgladzhuyuchi movu" (the first edition, which was reserved for another part in the list of 1746, the rock was written by my own, stylized from the old Russian language of literature, the friend was "translated" into the translation of the 18th century). With such a "shift" the author has set it up for another part.

Do not need special training, Tatishchev didn’t ever give an endless work of science, but in this historical work of life, he was placed before the nutrition of science and given the breadth of his horizons.

Among Tatishchev's most private scientific merits is the discovery and publication of the Russian Truth, the Code of Laws of Ivan the Terrible (+1550). Tatishchev steadily pov'yazuvav the Danes with the past: having explained the sense of the Moscow legislation by the witnesses of the court practice and by the guesses about the affairs of the 17th century; at the show of a special knowledge of the earthly people, we got to grips with the old Russian ethnography, from the lexicons of living movs, explaining the old names. As a result of the current day's call, Tatishchev's antimicrobials are not allowed to be busy with services from his main department. The Navpaks, while busy, were expanding and loving its historical intelligence.

The author's knowledge of the sovereign service did not allow the busy hour of history to come. Only in April 1746, if Tatishchev had been living by the time and was alive at his village Boldino, he wondered about his activity. However, his death on 15 April 1750 interrupted the fate of qiu pratsyu.

"History" is stored in a selection of parts;

· Chastina 1. History of found hours to Rurik.

· Chastina 2. Litopis from 860 to 1238 rock.

· Chastina 3. Litopis from +1238 to 1462 to rock.

· Chastina 4. Without a breakdown of the list from 1462 to 1558 rock, and a number of letters about the history of the Time of Troubles.

Liche Persha and other parts are completed by the author and include a significant number of primitives. At the first part of the annotations of the chapters, 650 annotations should be given in the rest of the edition. In the third and fourth parts of the day, there are a few chapters about the Hour of Troubles, where you can take revenge on the actions of the dzherela.

3. Dzherela of the first part of the "History"

The first part includes houses from the found hours to Rurik.

· Vityagi from the "History" of Herodotus (Ch. 12).

· Vityagi z book. VII "Geography" of Strabo (Ch. 13).

Z Plinia the Elder (Ch. 14).

· Z Klavdiya Ptolemy (ch. 15).

Z Kostyantin Porphyrogenitus (Ch. 16).

· 3 books of personal writers, pratsya Bayura (ch. 17).

A special place in the ethnogeographic statements of Tatishchev loan is Sarmatian theory. The etymological "method" of Tatishchev іlustru mіrkuvannya z Ch. 28: іstorik means "Venelain" in Finnish my Russian, Fini - sumaline, Germanic - saxoline, Swedish - rocklemaintobogo The same zagalnye element vіn vіdіlya in the vіdomichs behind the ancient dzherels the names of the tribes: Alani, Roksalani, Rakalani, Alanorsi, and to rob visnovok - Mova Fіnіv Near Movi Sarmativ. The announcement about the dispute of the Finno-Ugric peoples was already reflected in Tatishchev's hours.

The Іnsha group of etymology is tied with the sound of the Slovenian tribes in the ancient Dzherels. Zokrema, only Ptolemy, behind Tatishchev's boiled over (ch. 20), call these words: agoriti and pagoriti - from gir; bisi, tobto bosi; come in - come in; Zenchen, tobto grooms; Hemp - hemp; tolistobogi, tobto tovstobokih; tolistosagi, tobto is ogryadna; mothers, to be informed; Pleso, tobto plishivi; sabosi, or dogs; drop, tobto harrow; sapotreni - obachny; Sward, tobto weld (welding) etc.

4.Tatischevski views

Especially for those who know the problem of becoming so-called "Tatishchevski vidomosty", as revenge on information, which is not possible in the literature we see. Tse texts of a ripe obsyagu, from one or two words to the great general announcements, which include the great promises of the princes and boyars. Inodi Tatischev comments on the sounds in the primitives, look at the literature, it’s impossible to identify at all (“Rostovska”, “Golitsinskaya”, “Rozkolnitsky”, “Litopis of Simon”). Tatishchev does not appear in a large variety of original sounds.

A special place in the array of "Tatishchevski vidomosty" is loaned to the Joachimovskaia litopis - an inserted text, for the sake of special introductions by Tatishchev, and is a short passage of a special literature, which informed about the found Xth century Russian period. The author of the Joachim's literature was Tatishchev, having entrusted the first Novgorod bishop, Ioakim Korsunian, who was a confederate of Khreshchennya Rusi.

In the other half of the 19th century, S. M. Solovyov and some of the many authors began to "reabilitate" Tatishchev, systematically receiving this sound from the past until Chi did not produce the list of writings before us. At the same time, the summons of the history of the history were taken away. encyclopedic vocabulary Brockhaus and Efron characterizes the food supply at the turn of the 19th and 20th centuries. let's step in rank:

“The sum of Tatishchev, earlier was given to us through his so-called Joachim's literature, At this hour there will be a whole lot of money. Win some little sounds, for dzherel did not vigaduvav, ala inodi did not vypravlyav vlasn_name By shifting them onto their own language, presenting their own illumination, or making sounds, similar to the literary ones, from the dues, which made them trustworthy. Guidance literature references in the production, often without reference to the dzherela, Tatischev gave the day not history, but a new literary star, unsystematic and to finish the non-grabbing. "

At the XX century, the clerks of the reliability of the Tatischevsky houses of the boule A. A. Shakhmatov, M. N. Tikhomirov and especially B. A. Ribakov. Tsey stopped proponuvav to reach the large-scale concept, to introduce a special role in the formulation of the Tatischevsky star of the “rozkolnitsky literature” (from the reconstruction of political glances and to see the biography of the author). Skeptical hypotheses and great "tatischevskii views" were voiced by M. S. Grushevsky, A. E. Presnyakov, S. L. Peshtych (who owe the honor of a detailed reading of the manuscript of the first edition of the ancient "ancient" Lur'є. In 2005, the Ukrainian historian A. P. Tolochko, having seen an extensive monograph, in which it is easy to authenticate the efforts without the blame of "Tatischevsky vidomosty" and stverdzhu, as well as on the dzherela at Tatishchev after the last. From the point of view of A.P. Tolochko, who were REALLY victorious. Close (and more uncompromising) the position of the loan by the Russian historian A.V. Gorovenko. Yaksho A.P. Tolochko the visibility of the reality of Tatishchev’s rozkolnitsky literature, I would like to know the half Ukrainian manuscript of the 17th century (the typography “Khlabnikovskih type”, close to Holitsinskiy’s), by A.V. simple textual arguments. Prihilniks of authenticity of "Tatischevsky views" have also given the monograph by A.P. Tolochko a sharp criticism, I want to call them from their positions.