History of Russia (Tatishchev)

(1686 - 1750), Russian sovereign, Istorik. Finished in Moscow Engineering and Artillery School. Having taken part in Pivnichny Vіynі 1700-21, viconuvav in the development of Vіyskovo-diplomatic assignment of Tsar Peter I. In 1720-22 and 1734-37 keruvav in state-owned factories in the Urals, falling asleep in Yekaterinburg; in 1741-45 - Astrakhan governor. In 1730, he actively opposed the leaders (Verkhovna tamna Rada). Tatishchev prepared the first Russian publication of historical dzherels, introduced the text of the Russian Truth and the Code of Law 1550 into the scientific revision of the text of the Russian Truth and the Code of Law 1550, with a detailed commentary, posting developments in the Russian ethnography. Sklav the first Russian encyclopedic dictionary ("Lexicon of Russia"). Having made a ghastly pratsyu z vіtchiznyа іstorії, Writings on the basis of numerical Russian and foreign dzherel, - "" (books 1-5, M., 1768-1848).
"" Tatishcheva is one of the most important workers in the entire history of Russian history. Monumental, blissfully and easily written, the book is looking for the history of our land from the found hours - and right up to the tsar Fyodor Mikhailovich Romanov. The value of Tatishchev's work is special in the fact that the history of Russia is presented here IN ALL OVERVIEWS - in aspects not only of the political, but of the religious, of the cultural and of the beat!
Adaptation from Late Slavic - O. Kolesnikov (2000-2002)
History of Russia (Russian Doref. History of Russia; the name of the first vision is again: “History of Russia from the found hours, unceasingly through thirty years of choice and is described by the deceased secret radio Astrakhan governor Vasil Mikitovich Tatishchev ") - the great historical pratsy of the Russian historian Vasil Tatishchev, one of the most important creators of the Russian history of the other fourth of the XVIII century, a significant stage in the middle of the transition to the pre-eternal summer
"History" is stored from chotiroh parts; History XVII stolittya.

If this part is not completed Tatishchev V.N. and include a significant number of primitives. At the first part of the annotations of the chapters, 650 annotations should be given in the rest of the edition. In some parts of the day, in the chapters about the Hour of Troubles, to avenge the deeds of power on the dzherela.

Related Posts:

  • Putin, Macron, Tsishan and Abe at the plenary session ...

plan
Entry
1 Robot over "History"
2 Plan
Entry

3 Dzherela of the first part of the "History"
4 Tatischevski views
5 The problem of "minus-text" tatishchevsky pratsi
6 Dzherela other-fourth parts of the "History"
6.1 Cabinet manuscript
6.2 rozkolnitskikh litopis
6.3 Kenigsberg manuscript
6.4 The Golitsinsky manuscript
6.5 Cyril manuscript
6.6 Novgorod manuscript
6.7 Pskov manuscript
6.8 Krekshinsky manuscript
6.9 Nikon's manuscript
6.10 Nizhny Novgorod manuscript
6.11 Yaroslavl manuscript
6.12 Rostov manuscript
6.13 Manuscripts of Volinsky, Khrushchev and Eropkin
6.14 Orenburg manuscript

7 History of the 17th century
8 Vidannya
9 Doslidzhennya

Entry

Istoria Rosіyska (Povny Hosting Project pershit Vidanov "Istoria Rosіyska of naydavnіshih chasіv, nevsipuschimi Prace through tridtsyat rokіv zіbrana i described pokіynim taєmnim Rudnick i astrahanskim governor Vasil Mikitovichem Tatistchev") - a great іstorichny Prace rosіyskogo іstorika Vasil Tatіscheva, odne of nayvazhlivіshih tvorіv rosіyskoї іstorіografії other The fourth century of the 18th century, a significant stage in the transition from the middle-of-the-century literature to the critical style.

1. Robot over "History"

Until the head of his life, Tatishchev came to visit a whole series of surroundings. We can understand the skoda from the instability of soil geography of Russia and the links of geography from history, if you know the necessary information and take a look at all the historical views about Russia. So, as the earthly capital came to pass the mercy, Tatishchev turned up to the first time, becoming the vivchati of the literature and the material. A list of win mav on uvazi date historical tvir ("historical order" - that is the author's analogical tvir in the style of the New hour) Clearly the literature: the chronicles of the dates of the past, the sound between the names is implicit).

Yak Tatischev writes, having taken a thousand books from his library, but with a large part he has not been quicker, more than Volodya will be deprived of his useful and Polish movs. With the help of the Academy of Sciences for the help of the Academy of Sciences, the vicorist of the ancient authors, the viconany Kondratovich.

In 1739, Tatishchev was brought to St. Petersburg pratsyu, over yakim vin pratsyuvav, for yogo words, 15-20 years (tying the ear of robots with the so-called office manuscripts and specialties of Peter I and Ya.V. Bruce), pratsyuvati over it and zgladom, "zgladzhuyuchi movu" (the first edition, which was reserved for another part in the list of 1746, the rock was written by my own, stylized from the old Russian language of literature, the friend was "translated" into the translation of the 18th century). With such a "shift" the author has set it up for another part.

Do not need special training, Tatishchev didn’t ever give an endless work of science, but in this historical work of life, he was placed before the nutrition of science and given the breadth of his horizons.

Among Tatishchev's most private scientific merits is the discovery and publication of the Russian Truth, the Code of Laws of Ivan the Terrible (1550). Tatishchev steadily pov'yazuvav the Danes with the past: having explained the sense of the Moscow legislation by the witnesses of the court practice and by the guesses about the affairs of the 17th century; at the show of a special knowledge of the earthly people, we got to grips with the old Russian ethnography, from the lexicons of living movs, explaining the old names. As a result of the current day's call, Tatishchev's antimicrobials are not allowed to be busy with services from his main department. The Navpaks, while busy, were expanding and loving its historical intelligence.

The author's knowledge of the sovereign service did not allow the busy hour of history to come. Only in April 1746, if Tatishchev had been living by the time and was alive at his village Boldino, he wondered about his activity. However, his death on 15 April 1750 interrupted the fate of qiu pratsyu.

"History" is stored in a selection of parts;

· Chastina 1. History of found hours to Rurik.

· Chastina 2. Litopis from 860 to 1238 rock.

· Chastina 3. Litopis from 1238 to 1462 to rock.

· Chastina 4. Without a breakdown of the list from 1462 to 1558 rock, and a number of letters about the history of the Time of Troubles.

Liche Persha and other parts are completed by the author and include a significant number of primitives. At the first part of the annotations of the chapters, 650 annotations should be given in the rest of the edition. In the third and fourth parts of the day, there are a few chapters about the Hour of Troubles, where you can take revenge on the actions of the dzherela.

3. Dzherela of the first part of the "History"

The first part includes houses from the found hours to Rurik.

· Vityagi from the "History" of Herodotus (Ch. 12).

· Vityagi z book. VII "Geography" of Strabo (Ch. 13).

Z Plinia the Elder (Ch. 14).

· Z Klavdiya Ptolemy (ch. 15).

Z Kostyantin Porphyrogenitus (Ch. 16).

· 3 books of personal writers, pratsya Bayura (ch. 17).

A special place in the ethnogeographic statements of Tatishchev loan is Sarmatian theory. The etymological "method" of Tatishchev іlustru mіrkuvannya z Ch. 28: history stands for Venelain, Fini - Sumaline, German - Saxoline, Swedes - Roxoline, zagalny element"Alain", tobto the people. The same zagalnye element vіn vіdіlya in the vіdomichs behind the ancient dzherels the names of the tribes: Alani, Roksalani, Rakalani, Alanorsi, and to rob visnovok - Mova Fіnіv Near Movi Sarmativ. The announcement about the dispute of the Finno-Ugric peoples was already reflected in Tatishchev's hours.

The Іnsha group of etymology is tied with the sound of the Slovenian tribes in the ancient Dzherels. Zokrema, only Ptolemy, behind Tatishchev's stewed (Ch. 20) name words: Agoriti and pagoriti - from gir; bisi, tobto bosi; come in - come in; Zenchen, tobto grooms; Hemp - hemp; tolistobogi, tobto tovstobokih; tolistosagi, tobto is ogryadna; mothers, to be informed; Pleso, tobto plishivi; sabosi, or dogs; drop, tobto harrow; sapotreni - obachny; Sward, tobto weld (welding) etc.

4.Tatischevski views

Especially for those who know the problem of becoming so-called "Tatishchevski vidomosty", as revenge on information, which is not possible in the literature we see. Tse texts of a ripe obsyagu, from one or two words to the great general announcements, which include the great promises of the princes and boyars. Inodi Tatischev comments on the sounds in the primitives, refer to the literature, not modern science for it is necessary not to identify ("Rostovska", "Golitsinskaya", "Rozkolnitsky", "Litopis of Simon Bishop"). Tatishchev does not appear in a large variety of original sounds.

A special place in the array of "Tatishchev's views" loan short break special literature, which informs about found period History of Rus (IX-X centuries). The author of the Joachim's literature was Tatishchev, having entrusted the first Novgorod bishop, Ioakim Korsunian, who was a confederate of Khreshchennya Rusi.

In the history of the establishment, the head of Tatishchev's news was announced. The histories of the other half of the 18th century (Shcherbatov, Boltin) revised their views without revision according to the literature. Skeptically, the position before them is tied to the names of Schletzer and especially Karamzin. Tsey stayed in respect of Joachim's writings with Tatishchev's “zhartom” (to be a non-grabbing mistification), and rozkolnitsky's writings are more boldly voiced. At the presentation of a critical analysis, Karamzin introduced a number of specific tatish through a special zbіga obstavin).

In the other half of the 19th century, S. M. Solovyov and some of the many authors began to "reabilitate" Tatishchev, systematically receiving this sound from the past until Chi did not produce the list of writings before us. At the same time, the summons of the history of the history were taken away. encyclopedic vocabulary Brockhaus and Efron characterizes the food supply at the turn of the 19th and 20th centuries. let's step in rank:

“The sum of Tatishchev, earlier was given to us through his so-called Joachim's literature, At this hour there will be a whole lot of money. Win some little sounds, for dzherel did not vigaduvav, ala inodi did not vypravlyav vlasn_name By shifting them onto their own language, presenting their own illumination, or making sounds, similar to the literary ones, from the dues, which made them trustworthy. Guidance literature references in the production, often without reference to the dzherela, Tatischev gave the day not history, but a new literary star, unsystematic and to finish the non-grabbing. "

At the XX century, the clerks of the reliability of the Tatischevsky houses of the boule A. A. Shakhmatov, M. N. Tikhomirov and especially B. A. Ribakov. Tsey stopped proponuvav to reach the large-scale concept, to introduce a special role in the formulation of the Tatischevsky star of the “rozkolnitsky literature” (from the reconstruction of political glances and to see the biography of the author). Skeptical hypotheses and great "tatischevskii views" were voiced by M. S. Grushevsky, A. E. Presnyakov, S. L. Peshtych (who owe the honor of a detailed reading of the manuscript of the first edition of the ancient "ancient" Lur'є. In 2005, the Ukrainian historian A. P. Tolochko, having seen an extensive monograph, in which it is easy to authenticate the efforts without the blame of "Tatischevsky vidomosty" and stverdzhu, as well as on the dzherela at Tatishchev after the last. From the point of view of A.P. Tolochko, who were REALLY victorious. Close (and more uncompromising) the position of the loan by the Russian historian A.V. Gorovenko. Yaksho A.P. Tolochko the visibility of the reality of Tatishchev’s rozkolnitsky literature, I would like to know the half Ukrainian manuscript of the 17th century (the typography “Khlabnikovskih type”, close to Holitsinskiy’s), by A.V. simple textual arguments. Prihilniks of authenticity of "Tatischevsky views" have also given the monograph by A.P. Tolochko a sharp criticism, I want to call them from their positions.

Biography of Vasil Tatishchev

Tatishchev Vasil Mikitovich- Vidomy Russian historian, born on April 16, 1686 in the mother of yogo, Mikiti Oleksiyovich Tatishchev, in the Pskov poviti; navchavsya in the Moscow artillery and engineering school under the leadership of Bruce, taking part in), in the Prussian campaign; in 1713 - 14 rocky bouvs outside the cordon, in Berlin, Breslavl and Dresden, for knowledge of the sciences.

In 1717, Tatishchev knew the rock behind the cordon, in Danzigu, where Peter the Great sent complaints about the inclusion of an old-fashioned way in the contribution, about how sensitive it was, none of the writings of St. Methodim; ale the magistrate of the place did not sacrifice the image, but T. did not give Peter the impertinence of passing. Three of his trips outside the cordon Tatischev viviz is a lot of books. The letter of T.'s turn was formed under Bruce, the presidents of the berg- and the manufactory-colleges, and went with him to the Aland Congress.

A donation to Peter the Great about the need for a report on the geography of Russia was sent by Tatishchev before the writing of "Russian History", on which Bruce in 1719 told Peter, as a viconautsa of some kind of robot. T., messages to the Urals, immediately didn’t tell the tsar the plan of the robot, but Petro didn’t forget about the right and in 1724 he guessed about the new Tatishchev. Taking up the right, T. felt the need for historical information and that, having shifted geography to a different plan, having started to pick materials for history.

For an hour, the ear of tsikh robits to introduce Tatichev's plan, clearly tying with him: in 1719 he gave the princess an announcement, in any way ordering the need to be interconnected in Russia. In T.'s thoughts, the insult to the plan was ringing; in the sheets to Cherkasov in 1725, it was as if the values ​​were "to the land surveying of the whole state and the creation of soil geography from the land map".

In the 1720s, the history of the history and geography of Tatishchev was completed. Vin buv messages "in the Siberian province on the Kungur and in the first few places, de-shouting the sound of the mission, to build the backwaters and from the ores, and the means to melt." Youmu brought the action in the land a little at home, uncivilized, long ago served as an arena for all sorts of evil. Having taken over this region, Tatishchev settled not in Kungur, but in Uktussk plants, de and having fallen asleep in management, was named on the cob of the girsk office, but instead of the Siberian girsk leadership.

The first hour of Vasil Tatishchev's first transfer to the Ural factories has grown in size even more: the Uktusskiy factory has been moved to the river. Іnіt і there poklav cob of Ninishny Yekaterinburg; take the permission to allow merchants to pass to the Іrbitsky fair and through the sky, and also lay down a piece of Vyatka and Kungur; at factories there are two schools of corn, two - for the beginning of the state service; viclopotav installing a special court for factories; sklav instructions for the maintenance of lisiv and so on.

Come in Tatishchev wikkicked Demidov's dissatisfaction, who bachiv gave his own performance in the establishment of state-owned factories. For the rassliduvannya a super-transmission to the Urals of messages from Buv Genik, who knows what T. has come to all right. T. bouv vypravdaniy, on the ear of 1724 presented himself to Peter, bouv conduction in the radniks of the berg-colleges and signs in the Siberian Ober-berg-AMT. They were sent to Sweden for the necessities of the state registration and for the appointment of diplomatic documents.

In Switzerland Vasil Tatishchev having tested from the breast 1724 to the quarter of 1726, having looked around the backwaters and mines, having picked up a chair and plans, finding a granuvial maister, which has put into the turn of the Granuvaln on the right in Yekaterinburg, having taken advantage of the system of coins about trading in the home from the bagatma with the monastic vices, etc. Turning from the trip to Sweden and Dania, Tatischev for a day was busy with the folds of the sound, I want not to receive messages from the bergamt, but, however, the messages to Siberia.

In 1727, Tatishchev was appointed a member of the monetary office, such as the ordering of the boules of the mint; at the end of the day they found the fate of 1730.

A note was put in the drive of Yikh Tatishchev, and 300 people were signed from the gentry. Winning that Russia, as a great land, is the most promising for monarchical management, but all the same, "for additional help" the empress will be snowed under the new Senate from 21 members and from 100 members to immediately proponuvalis come in for the lodging of the position of the small classes of the population. In addition, the nezapannya guards wait for a change in the sovereign lad, the whole project was lost by marno, ale noviy uryad, bachachi in Vasyl Tatishchev, the guardian of the leaders, put to a new courteous: vin buv ober-ceremonial master on the day of the coronation. Having become the chief judge of the monetary office, T. began to read more about the polishing of the Russian monetary system.

In 1731, T. regretted a neporosumіnnya s, so they called before that, wіn bіv іddanіn a trial for incursions wіth habarnіstvі. In 1734 rotsi Tatishchev buv of voices to the court and to the sign of the Urals, "for the breeding of factories." Youmu has been completed with the folding of the Civil Statute. Pookie T. went to factories, bringing in her own spirit a lot of cinnamon to factories and regions: with a new number of factories it grew up to 40; new mines were gradually discovered, and so on in the power of 36 factories, which were deprived of ten years later. Between the new mines, the mountain of Grace was occupied by T.

The right to be involved in the management of private factories Vasil Tatishchev koristuvavavshis to do it widely and more than once wicked against himself the addiction and skargi. Vzagaly, I’m not a hitchhiker of private factories, I’m not styled through a special corysty, a bit of evidence of the fact that the powers used to be thrown, but I’ll take it more privately, I don’t care for people. In 1737, Biron, bazhayuchi usunuti Tatishchev from the state law, having designated him in Orenburzka as an expedition for the residual arrangement of Bashkiria and annexing the administration of the Bashkirs. Here you have the distance to spend a few humane visits: for example, win viclopotav, the delivery of the yasak was deposited mutely on the yasachniks and tsiluvalniks, and on the Bashkir foremen.

In 1739, after arriving at St. Petersburg in 1739, a bullet was created for viewing skargs on a new one. They called him in "attacks and habaras", not with the efforts of T. P. Є it is possible to admit that in these attacks a piece of truth was thrown, but the camp of T. Bulo would be brighter, as a result of the work of Biron. and in Veresnі 1740 she condemned him until the rank was dropped. Virok, however, did not write vikoniy.U tsei, important for T. rіk vin, wrote her povchaniya synovі - "Spiritual". 1741 Rots of signs in Tsaritsin to govern the Astrakhan province, the chief rank for the priest of the zavorushen of the middle of the Kalmiks.

The presence of the necessary military forces and the intrigues of the Kalmyk volodars made T. coveted something. If she ascended to the throne, T. was encouraged to be heard from the Kalmyk committee, but did not reach it at all: it was not a matter of being deprived of the city until 1745, if, after a while, they were sent from the prison. Having arrived in his village of Boldino, Tatishchev did not go to death. Here he finished his history, brought it back to Petersburg in 1732, and even to the extent that there were no arrangements. Leafy, led by T. from the village, came to us.

Before one death, we went to the church, and we went to see the maystrov with shovels. Writing a liturgy from the priest to the pantry and giving the grave of the ancestors. Asking, asking the priest for the first day, come to finish yogo. Udoma vin znayshov kur'ura, which gave a decree, forgive yogo, i. Win turning the order, saying, "go to the world". The next day, he finished the day, saying goodbye to Usima and died (15 April 1750).

Vasil Tatishchev's head could have come from the family under Katherine 2. All the literary activity of T., including the history and geography, passed through the public opinion: the corny of the suspension of the head of the head. T. buv svіdomim Utilіtaristi. Svitoglyad yogo vikladeno in yo "Rose two friends about the corny of sciences and schools." The main idea of ​​the bullet's view is fashionable at that hour, the idea of ​​natural law, natural morality, natural religion, suggested by T. in Pufendorf and Walch. Vishcha meta abo "truly prosperous", for a glance, a glimpse of the strength of the soul, in the "calm soul and conscience", so that a path can reach the development of the "corny" science; to the rest Tatishchev introduced medicine, economy, law and philosophy.

Until the head of his life, Tatishchev came to visit a whole series of surroundings. We can understand the skoda from the instability of soil geography of Russia and the links of geography from history, if you know the necessary information and take a look at all the historical views about Russia. So, as the earthly capital came to pass the mercy, Tatishchev turned up to the first time, becoming the vivchati of the literature and the material. A collection of winners on uvazi date historical tvir, ale potim, you know, in the literature, never seen before, didn’t read it by hand, circulating the writing in a purely literary order.

In 1739, T. went to St. Petersburg for the first time, over 20 years of success, and transferring it to the Academy of Sciences for zberigannya; Do not need special training, T. didn’t miss the limitless science of science, but in this historical work of life, the focus on science and the breadth of the outlook was given. T. steadily pov'yazuvav the Danish from the past: having explained the sense of the Moscow legislation by the witnesses of the court practice and by the guesses about the success of the 17th century; at the show of a special knowledge of the native people, we got to grips with the old Russian ethnography; from the lexicons of living mov explaining the old name.

As soon as the day is over, Tatishchev has not been busy with services from his main department; Navpaks, while busy, were expanding and loving its historical intelligence. The sum of Tatishchev, earlier, was given to us through his so-called (div. Litopis), in the given hour it is worth all sorts of sums. Win some sounds, for dzherel did not vigaduvav, ala innocently corrected the power names, shifting them to their own language, presenting their own smudge, or making the sounds, which are useful in writing, from the past.

Guide the literary references in the building, often without reference to the dzherela, T. giving, vreshti-resht, according to the essence, not history, but a new literary star, unsystematic and abundant non-grabbing. The first two parts of the I volume of "History" were seen in 1768 - 69 rock in Moscow, G.F. Miller, under the name "History of Russia from found hours in unabashed times after 30 years of election and described by the deceased local radar and Astrakhan governor V.N.T." Volume II was seen in 1773 rotsi, volume III - in 1774 rotsi, volume IV - in 1784 rotsi, and volume V was based on the knowledge of M.P. Weather deprived in 1843 of the growth and visions of the history and old-life of the Russian people in 1848.

Tatishchev organizing the material until the hour of Vasil III's death; However, after the procurement was completed, the residual material was not edited until 1558; a number of handwritten materials for the new era, but not far from 1613 to the fate. Part of T.'s preparatory work is stored in Miller's portfolios. Krim іstorії T. and the zagadanny vishche rozmovi, with a great number of creations of a public character: "Duchovna", "Nagaduvannya on the dispatch of high and lower powers and zemsky districts", "Minority" about the massacre.

"Duchovna" (seen in 1775) is given by the lecturers, who will encompass all the lives and activities of the people (pomist). There is a treaty about vikhovannya, about childish labor of service, about bringing up to the bosses and pidleglich, about family life, management of maetkom and government gifts and t. P. In "nagaduvannya" rev_z_ї 1742 fate will come in before many incomes of the powers. Vasil Mikitovich Tatishchev is a typical "", with a great mind, he goes over from one subject to the next, he pushes to the good of the day at all their scientific workers.

Por. ON. Popov "Tatishchev and the First Hour" (Moscow, 1861); P. Pekarsky "News about V. N. T." (III volume, "Notes of the Imperial Academy of Sciences", St. Petersburg, 1864);" About the publication of V. N. T.'s works and materials for his biography "(A. A. Kunikov, 1883, view of the Imperial Academy of Sciences); K. N. Bestuzhev-Ryumin" Biographies and characteristics "(St. Petersburg, 1882) ; Senіgіv "Historical and critical messages about the Novgorod literature and about the Russian history of Tatishchev" (Moscow, 1888; review by S.F. D. Korsakov "From the Life of Russian Acts of the 18th Century" (ib., 1891); N. Popov "Vcheni and Literary Pratsi T." (St. Petersburg, 1886); P.N. Moscow, 1897).

] Author: Vasil Mikitovich Tatishchev. Popular science.
(Moscow: Vidavnitstvo "AST"; ZAT NVP "Yrmak", 2005. - Series "Klasichna dumka")
Scan, revision, Djv format: Timofiy Marchenko, 2011

  • ЗМІСТ:
    STORIA ROSІYSKA
    CHASTINA PERSHA
    For the foregoing information about the history of the foreign and Russian (5).
    Chapter 1. About the longevity of the leaves of the Slavs (29).
    Chapter 2. About idol service to colishny (35).
    Chapter 3. About the christening of words і Rusі (44).
    Chapter 4. About the history of Ioakim Bishop of Novgorod (51).
    Chapter 5. About Nestor and the yogi literature (71).
    Chapter 6. About Nestor was sent to the writer (75).
    The head of the 7. About the lists of abo manuscripts, lived to the end of the collection (78).
    Chapter 8. About the calculated hour and ear of fate (82).
    Chapter 9. About prodigality, podіlі and change of people (86).
    Chapter 10. Reasons for the rise of the name of the people (89).
    Chapter 11. I will name Skif and living (92).
    Chapter 12. The tale of Herodotus of Geliokarnassky about the Scythians, Sarmatians and іnshikh (101).
    Chapter 13. Strabo's narration from this book (124).
    Chapter 14. The words of Plinia the Elder Seconds (145).
    Chapter 15. The tale of Claudia Ptolemy Oleksandriyskiy (169).
    Chapter 16. Z Kostyantin Porfirogenita about Russia and its neighbors and people, picked up by Sigfrid Bayor (183).
    Chapter 17. Three books of personal writers, compiled by Sigfrid Bayer (224).
    Chapter 18. Zalishki Scythians, Turks and Tatars (265).
    Chapter 19. Views of the Scythians and Sarmatians (281).
    Chapter 20. I will name Sarmatians, walking and living (285).
    Chapter 21. Sarmatian Russian and Polish history (292).
    Chapter 22. Get lost in Sarmati (296).
    Chapter 23. About Getah, Gotіv and Gepіdi (304).
    Chapter 24. About KIMBRIYA, abo tsimbrіv, і Kіmmerії (310).
    Chapter 25. About the Bulgarians and Khvalisi, who were among the ancient argipei and issedoni (324).
    Chapter 26. About pechenіgіv, polovtsіv and Torquay (332).
    Chapter 27. Eels and Aubri, among the Transcordonian Guni and Avari, among the ancient Essedoni (336).
    Chapter 28. Alani, Roksalani, Rakalani, Alanorsi and Letalani (344).
    Chapter 29. Byarmi, abo Perm, Gordorik, Ostergard, Hunigard, Ulmiogardia and Golmogardia (347).
    Chapter 30. Russia, rutheni, Roksana, Roksolani and Russia (352).
    Chapter 31. Varangians, a kind of people i de bouv (358).
    Chapter 32. The author Theophil Sigefra Bayur about the Varangians (363).
    Chapter 33. Slovyany from whom, de and if named (393).
    Chapter 34. About living in ancient times and the transition of words to different names (402).
    Chapter 35. Іneti, abo geneti, heti, daki, іstri (411).
    Chapter 36. About Bulgarians and Ghazar (422).
    Chapter 37. Basic words (427).
    Chapter 38. Holy Words (429).
    Chapter 39. Foreign words (437).
    Chapter 40. Personal words (445).
    Chapter 41. Mova Slov'yan and Vidminnost 'Narichchya (449).
    Chapter 42. About a lot and about the application of words і movi (452).
    Chapter 43. About geography and about Russia (455).
    Chapter 44. Long ago came to Russia (468).
    Chapter 45. About the ancient Russian uryad and in the butt (480).
    Chapter 46. About the ancestors of the Russian sovereigns (500).
    Chapter 47. About the ієrarchії (511).
    Chapter 48. About rituals and ancient zaboboni (522).
    Notes (540).

Annotation of view: Tatishchev's "History of Russia" is one of the most important workers in the entire history of Russian history. Monumental, blisky and accessible, it is written, the book is looking for the history of our land from the found hours - and right up to the tsar Fyodor Mikhailovich Romanov. The value of Tatishchev's work is special in the fact that the history of Russia is presented here IN ALL OVERVIEWS - in aspects not only of the political, but of the religious, of the cultural and of the beat!

Until the head of his life, Tatishchev came to visit a whole series of surroundings. We can understand the skoda from the instability of soil geography of Russia and the links of geography from history, if you know the necessary information and take a look at all the historical views about Russia. So, as the earthly capital came to pass the mercy, Tatishchev turned up to the first time, becoming the vivchati of the literature and the material. A list of win mav on uvazi date historical tvir ("historical order" - that is the author's analogical tvir in the style of the New hour) Clearly the literature: the chronicles of the dates of the past, the sound between the names is implicit).

Yak Tatischev writes, having taken a thousand books from his library, but with a large part he has not been quicker, more than Volodya will be deprived of his useful and Polish movs. With the help of the Academy of Sciences for the help of the Academy of Sciences, the vicorist of the ancient authors, the viconany Kondratovich.

  • Vityagi from the "History" of Herodotus (Ch. 12).
  • Vityagi s book. VII "Geography" of Strabo (Ch. 13).
  • Z Plinia the Elder (Ch. 14).
  • Claudia Ptolemy (ch. 15).
  • Z Kostyantin Porphyrogenitus (Ch. 16).
  • Three books of personal writers, pratsya Bayura (ch. 17).

A special place in the ethnogeographic statements of Tatishchev loan is Sarmatian theory. The etymological "method" of Tatishchev іlustru mіrkuvannya z Ch. 28: іstorik means "Venelain" in Finnish my Russian, Fini - sumaline, Germanic - saxoline, Swedish - rocklemaintobogo The same zagalnye element vіn vіdіlya in the vіdomichs behind the ancient dzherels the names of the tribes: Alani, Roksalani, Rakalani, Alanorsi, and to rob visnovok - Mova Fіnіv Near Movi Sarmativ. The announcement about the dispute of the Finno-Ugric peoples was already reflected in Tatishchev's hours.

The Іnsha group of etymology is tied with the sound of the Slovenian tribes in the ancient Dzherels. Zokrema, only Ptolemy, behind Tatishchev's boiled over (ch. 20), call these words: agoriti and pagoriti - from gir; bisi, tobto bosi; come in - come in; Zenchen, tobto grooms; Hemp - hemp; tolistobogi, tobto tovstobokih; tolistosagi, tobto is ogryadna; mothers, to be informed; Pleso, tobto plishivi; sabosi, or dogs; drop, tobto harrow; sapotreni - obachny; Sward, tobto weld (welding) etc.

tatishchevsky vidomosty

Especially for those who know the problem of becoming so-called "Tatishchevski vidomosty", as revenge on information, which is not possible in the literature we see. Tse texts of a ripe obsyagu, from one or two words to the great general announcements, which include the great promises of the princes and boyars. Inodi Tatischev comments on the sounds in the primitives, look at the literature, it’s impossible to identify at all (“Rostovska”, “Golitsinskaya”, “Rozkolnitsky”, “Litopis of Simon”). Tatishchev does not appear in a large variety of original sounds.

A special place in the array of "Tatishchevski vidomosty" is loaned to the Ioakimovskaya Litopis - an inserted text, for the sake of special introductions by Tatishchev, and is a short passage of a special literature, which informs about the found Xth century Russian period. The author of the Joachim's literature was Tatishchev, having entrusted the first Novgorod bishop, Ioakim Korsunian, who was a confederate of Khreshchennya Rusi.

In the history of the establishment, the head of Tatishchev's news was announced. The histories of the other half of the 18th century (Shcherbatov, Boltin) revised their views without revision according to the literature. Skeptically, the position before them is tied to the names of Schletzer and especially Karamzin. Tsey stayed in respect of Joachim's writings with Tatishchev's “zhartom” (to be a non-grabbing mistification), and rozkolnitsky's writings are more boldly voiced. At the presentation of a critical analysis, Karamzin introduced a number of specific tatish through a special zbіga obstavin).

Tsikavo, many skeptics (Peshtych, Lur'є, Tolochko) do not call Tatishchev in the scientific inconsistency and unaware that Tatishchev didn’t bully in an hour happy to understand about the science of ethics and the strict rules of formalizing the historical record. "Tatishchevski vidomosty", as bi before them are not put, є it’s not just a misconception of the reader, but sooner I’m imagining self-actualized preliminaries, as well as not simple “fiction”. Additional views are, as a rule, visible in the dzherels of logical Lanka, reconstructed by the author, and illustrated by political and educational concepts. Discussion about "Tatishchevski vidomosty" is trivial.

The problem of "minus-text" tatishchevsky pratsi

The statement of the problem, like the term itself, is due to A. V. Goovenko. Tsei prelіdnik called "minus-text" sounds, like Tatishchev’s on the day, I want є in the Ipatievsky and Khlabnikovsky literatures (in the whole terminology of the supplementary text, which are also “present” The main array of tatishchevskoy text mіzh 1113 і 1198 pp. go down to the list of the same type, which is good for us in the name of the Іpatіїvskiy and Khlebnikovskiy. Yaksho dzherelo Tatishcheva buv short quality, Nіzh two went to us the literature of the same type, why should the Tatischevskiy text take revenge not only on additional updates, ale and great lacunas, but also majestic is the number of defective readings, including a number of complete comic books? Viewed on the side of food from the side of the clerk in the reliability of tatischevsky views of the city.

Dzherela other-fourth parts of the "History"

Dzherel Tatishchev's literature is characterized by himself in Ch. 7 parts of the first "History".

Preserved also the first edition of the given text, which has a number of caveats, as well as the characteristics of the dzherel, was saved in the Nimetsky translation.

cabinet manuscript

In the first edition of the list of dzherel not guessed zvsim. According to Tatishchev's description, he repudiated it in 1720 from the library of Peter I and becoming a part of all the collection, the whole list of "people", brought to 1239 fate, but the end was consumed. Briefly a viklad podії to Yuriy Dolgoruky, then reports.

On Tikhomirov's dummy, the whole literature has been ruined. For Peshtych and V.A. It was also said that I’m about the same illustrated copy of the Radziwill’s literature (div. Nizche).

Tolochko shilny zasumnivatsya in yo iznuvanny or let it go, but the phrase "with persons" does not mean the creation of the star, but the manifestation in the new description of the name of the characters, included by Tatishchev in the "History".

rozkolnitskikh litopis

For Tatishchev, who was recognized in Siberia as a rozkolnik in 1721, the whole copy of an old manuscript on parchment ends with one thousand one hundred ninety-seven rock and put in the title the name of Nestor. With regard to modern terminology, in 1721 Tatishchev was not in power in Siberia, but in the Urals. The manuscript, if it was lost, was ruined.

It is well known to the optimists that the editorial office of the Kiev Litopis is not aware of it. Zokrema, B. A. Ribakov saw the soundless unique sounds of the entire list (186 sounds for the XII century) and the sounds in the main one up to the "Literary of Peter Borislavich".

On the thought of A.P. Tolochko, the proportion of the debate in the supplementary Tatischev's views and the text of the Patriarch's list is very natural and it is quite natural to explain the particularity of Tatishchev's creative manners:

Tolochko stverdzhu, but a number of reading "History of Russia" for the XII century can not go down to the Ermolaevsky list, but render the list of the Ipatievsky literature, close to Khlebnikovsky. There is a whole hypothetical list of Tolochko and the deluded Rozkolnitskiy litiswriters, who are responsible for all Tatishchev's views, which will be referred to the old manuscript, є mistified. On the thought of Tolochko, a friend of the Khlabnikov's type of literature, really Vikoristan Tatishchev and seeing for the "rozkolnitsky", for the right, she was in the library of Prince D.M. in the title of Nestor as a writer. However, all without a blame for the textual criticism of Tolochko, as they inflicted nothing on the victorian Tatischevim "another script of the Khdebnik type,"

Kenigsberg manuscript

For Peter I, the copy of the Kenygsberzkiy literature was destroyed, at the same time as the name of Radzivilovskiy. A copy of the copy is kept in the Library of the Academy of Sciences (31.7.22).

Triva until 1206 fate, ale the end of the world. Tse a complete description of the original.

Zgіdno A.P. Tolochko, go in quietly in the fall, if Tatishchev tries to clearly identify the literature (for example, Radziwilovskaya), he admits the obvious pardons.

Golitsinskiy manuscript

It is familiar to the textual analysis of S.L. For the іnshaya dumkoyu (M.N. Tikhomirov, B.A.

An important argument for the toughness of Tatishchev's insanity is the fact that all of the manuscripts of the Ipatyivskiy Litopis are revenge on Kyiv, as well as the Galicia-Volinskiy Litopis. However, as meaning N.M. Karamzin, Tatischeva was in the house of only Kyivska, but not Galitsko-Volynskyi litopis.

Tatischev means that the Golitsinsky manuscript was completed in 1198 rots, and after 19 years it was introduced without order of addition. In the first saved version of the description of Tatischev's writings, as well as in the whole manuscript bulo from Striykovsky. In the residual version, the phrase is tidied up.

per happy news, Razriv between the ends of Kiev and the ear of the Galicia-Volinsky list of schools 5-6 rocks. However, on the margins of the Ermolaevsky list, there is a refusal of 19 rockets, and a view to the similarity with the text of Striykovsky.

Zgіdno Tolochko, Tatischev, having accepted the text of the Galicia-Volynskiy list in the Ermolaevskiy list for Tvіr, has fallen from the Polish historian Striykovskiy (more offending the texts took the praise of Roman Mstislavich), I do not know about them because of the children There was no more opportunity to turn up to the library of D.M. Golitsin.

Cyril manuscript

Razpochato by the shift of the Chronograph from the beginning of the svitu, promotions to Ivan the Terrible.

For Tikhomirov, the book of Statechna, for the thought of Peshtich, taken by Tolochko - a friend of a part of the Lviv literature.

Novgorod manuscript

For Tatishchev, the names of the Vremennik, including the Law of Yaroslavl and Maє, was written about the folding in 1444; Recognition of a historian from a rozkolnik in the list and publications in the Library of the Academy of Sciences. Infected vidomy yak Academic list of the Novgorod first literature of the young divorce, which is efficient to avenge the truth on Rus. Zgidno B.M. Kloss, Tolstoy list of these writings by the clerk in the library of D.M. Golitsin in the end of the 1720s.

Pskov manuscript

The whole manuscript of the text of the Novgorod P'yatoi (with additional figures) and the Pskov first literatures and was preserved in the Library of the Academy of Sciences 31.4.22 with the signs of Tatishchev, the text of the Pskov period will end 1547. ... For Tatishchev, 1468 will end with rock. Pskov zvistki Tatishchev did not boom vicoristano.

Krekshinsky manuscript

According to Tatishchev's description, wines of promotions for 1525 rik, including the childbirth, are seen from Novgorodskoy behind the warehouse of sounds and according to dates.

On the thought of Peshtych, the whole list of the "Russian Vedomosti" and "Voskresenskoy Litopisu". On the thought of Ya. S. Lur'є, the Novgorod editorial office of the Statistical Book. Zgіdno Tolochko, the list of Krivoborsky, the Chortkiv list of Volodymyr's writers, published in volume XXX PSRL.

Nikon's manuscript

For Tatishchev, the "Litographer of the Resurrection Monastery", signed by the hand of Patriarch Nikon and continued until 1630. The ear of yogo is similar to the rozkolnitsky and Kenigsbergska, and until 1180 the rock is close to the Golitsinsky.

Seemingly, the basis of the texts of parts 3 and 4 of the "History" of the boule was deposited with the Academic XV list of Nikon's list of literature (above to the Library of the Academy of Sciences from the collection of Theophan Prokopovich in 1741), a copy of the documentary written by the author 39 Bula was divided into two volumes, in niy є Tatishchev's marks.

Nizhny Novgorod manuscript

Behind Tatishchev's wislovoy, it will end in 1347 rock, and not less than 300 rock. About yogo sorcerer Tatishchev povidomlyaє in sheets from 12 spring 1741 rock.

Zgidno M.N. Tikhomirov, tse Alatirsky list of the Resurrection literature, which is innocentїї text. For the occasional tribute, the manuscript dates back to the third quarter of the 16th century and was brought to 1347.

Yaroslavl manuscript

Purchases from a retailer on the square, gifts to the English Royal suspension. Mа bezlich additional from the death of Dmitry Donskoy. For Tolochko, the same Rostov, which is supposed to be hidden in primitka.

Manuscripts of Volinsky, Khrushchev and Eropkin

For the assessment of A.P. Tolochko, he saved a number of manuscripts from the Volinsky library, including a number of copies of the 17th-18th centuries, and there are no shukany texts there. The texts of the Eropkіnskіy lіtopіkі are close to "Told about the ear of Moscow". Khrushchev's manuscript is a tse Khrushchev's list of the Statistical book with a number of additional 17th century.

History of the 17th century

At "Proceedings" to the first part of Tatishchev, a number of dzherels were guessed, which can be traced back to the history of the 17th century, a large part of which was saved and identified. However, among them it is said:

seeing

The first two parts of the 1st volume of the "History" will be seen for the first time in - pp. in Moscow by G. F. Miller (I volume I part, facsimile in pdf and I volume II part, facsimile in pdf). Volume II was seen in volume II (Volume II, facsimile in pdf), Volume III - in 1774 Rіk m (Volume III, facsimile in pdf) (Volume II-III includes another part of "History"), Volume IV (third section " History ") - in 1784 rotsi (IV volume, facsimile in pdf), and the manuscript of the fourth part of the" History "was known by M.P. іst. that in. grew up. in 1848 rotsi (V volume, facsimile in pdf).

With the whole deprivation of persh and other parts of the boule, in the main it was finished by the author. The third and fourth parts have gone through the first-time reprobation and the basis for everything on the Nikonivskoy Litopis with additional supplements.

Even before the establishment of Tatishchev’s pratsyu there will be a number of contemporary histories. A part of Tatishchev's preparatory work for his death was stored in Miller's briefcases. In addition, a number of materials from Tatishchev were published by the viewers of the Radziwill literature in 1767 to supplement the text.

Outside the academic vision of Tatishchev's "History" (including the never seen before the first edition) came in 1962-1968 rock and revisited in 1994. At the end of the 1st volume, including the first part, II-III volumes - another published edition of another part, IV volume - the first edition of another part, V volume - the third part, VI volume - the fourth part, VII volume - the actions of the preparatory materials. Volumes revenge readings, comments, as well as an archeographic survey of Tatishchev's manuscripts, prepared by S.N.Valk.

Published in 2003 by the AST version and available on-line (Volume 1 Volume 2 Volume 3 The third volume “History” was prepared in spelling, close to the current one. ".

  • Tatishchev V.N. Zbirka creation. U 8 t. M.-L., Science. 1962-1979. (Revision: M., Ladomir. 1994)
    • Vol. 1. Part 1. 1962.500 pages ; S. N. Valka "About the manuscripts of a part of the first" History of Russia "V. N. Tatishchev, pp. 54-75)
    • T.2. Part 2. Ch. 1-18. 1963.352 pp.
    • T.3. Part 2. Chapter 19-37. 1964.340 pp.
    • T.4. First edition of Part 2 of "History of Russia". 1964.556 pp.
    • T.5. Part 3. Chapter 38-56. 1965.344 pp.
    • T.6. Part 4. 1966.438 pp.
    • T.7. 1968.484 pp.
    • T.8. Little do it. 1 979.
  • Tatishchev V.N. Notes. Leaves. (Series "Naukova Spadschina". T.14). M., Science. 1990.440 pp. ( including leafing, tied with a robot over the "History")

Notes

  1. Gorovenko A.V. Sword of Roman Galitsky. Prince Roman Mstislavich in history, epics and legends. - SPb.: "Dmitro Bulanin", 2011. "S. 294-303.
  2. Ya. S. Lur'є. History of Russia in the literature and springs of the New Hour
  3. Tolochko A. “The History of Russia” by Vasil Tatishchev: Dzherela and Evidence. - Moscow: New Literary Review; Kiev: Criticism, 2005.544 p. Series: Historia Rossica. ISBN 5-86793-346-6, ISBN 966-7679-62-4. Book discussion: http://magazines.russ.ru/km/2005/1/gri37.html Magazine Hall | Critical Masa, 2005 N1 | Faina Grimbergen - Oleksiy Tolochko. "History of Russia" by Vasil Tatishchev
  4. Gorovenko A.V. Sword of Roman Galitsky. Prince Roman Mstislavich in history, epics and legends. - SPb.: "Dmytro Bulanin", 2011. "Tatishchevski vidomosty" of assignments to the chapters of another part: p. 261-332.
  5. Gorovenko A.V. Sword of Roman Galitsky. Prince Roman Mstislavich in history, epics and legends. - SPb.: "Dmitro Bulanin", 2011. S. 421-426 (Dodatok 6. Chi mav Tatishchev "another list" of the Ipatyivskiy Litopis? Similarity of Articles 6652 and 6654 pp. Tatishchevskiy Litopisnogo Zvodu). Pp. 426-434 (Dodatok 7. Farewell to the Rozkolnitsky literature. About the textual proofs of the other Khlabnikovsky type of literature by Tatishchev, presented by A. P. Tolochko).
  6. A. V. Zhuravel. "Brekhun, base and regotun"
  7. Div., For example: S. L. Peshtich. Russian history of the XVIII century. L., 1965. Part 1.P. 261.
  8. Gorovenko A.V. Sword of Roman Galitsky. Prince Roman Mstislavich in history, epics and legends. - SPb.: "Dmitro Bulanin", 2011. S. 313-320
  9. Tolochko 2005, p. 53; Tatishchev V.N. Op. Vol. 1. M.-L., 1962.S. 47, 446
  10. Gorovenko A.V. Sword of Roman Galitsky. Prince Roman Mstislavich in history, epics and legends. - SPb.: "Dmitro Bulanin", 2011. - p. 307.
  11. Tolochko 2005, p. 285-286
  12. Tolochko 2005, pp. 166-169
  13. Tolochko 2005, p. 153
  14. Tolochko 2005, p.103, 142-143, 159-166
  15. however, A.P. Tolochko has revealed the Polish translation of the Ipatyivskyi literature ("Annales S. Nestoris"), the chipping of the 18th century by Metropolitan Lev Kishkoy, for the first time Galitsko-Volinskyi literature (Tolochko 2005), p.116-134
  16. Tatishchev V.N. Op. T.7. M., 1968.S. 58
  17. PSRL, vol. II. M., 1998. Readings from the Ermolaevsky list, str. 83 okremoї pagіnatsіyu
  18. Tolochko 2005, p. 108, 115
  19. Tatishchev V.N. Op. Vol. 1. M., 1962.S. 47
  20. Tolochko 2005, p. 58
  21. Tolochko 2005, p. 60; for a description of the manuscript, see Pskov Litopis. PSRL. T. V. Vip. 1.M., 2003.S. XX, L-LI
  22. Tatishchev V.N. Op. U 8 vol. T. 3. M., 1964.p.309
  23. Tolochko 2005, pp.65-68
  24. Tatishchev V.N. Notes. Leaves. M., 1990.S. 281
  25. Tolochko 2005, p. 170-177
  26. Tolochko 2005, p.180-182
  27. Tolochko 2005, p.185-190